US Might Ban Short Selling to Save Its Banks

PayPal's Crypto Move: A Dollar-Backed Token for Online Payments

The US banking sector is facing a crisis as several regional banks have collapsed or suffered huge losses in the past few months. Some analysts and industry players have blamed short sellers for exacerbating the situation by betting against these struggling stocks and spreading fear among investors.

What is Short Selling?

Short selling is a form of investment that looks to profit from a decline in the price of a security. A short seller borrows a stock from a broker and sells it in the market, hoping to buy it back later at a lower price and return it to the lender. The difference between the selling and buying prices is the short seller’s profit or loss.

Why Might Short Selling be Banned?

According to a report by BeInCrypto, analysts at JP Morgan believe that US regulators might target short selling to prevent a contagion amid the rising banking crisis. They cited a letter from the American Banker Association (ABA) to the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), expressing concern that short sellers might be manipulating the market and causing share prices to deviate from their underlying fundamentals.

JP Morgan noted that it has never seen a situation where a “perfectly healthy bank” ends up in the hands of the FDIC (Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation) within a very short period. They also pointed out that the pressure affected even banks in good financial positions as more Americans now worry about their money in these banks.

Short sellers have reportedly made over $1.2 billion from betting against these struggling stocks, according to data firm Ortex. Some of the most affected banks include Pacific Western in Los Angeles and First Horizon in Tennessee, which have seen significant declines in their share values over the past two months.

What Would be the Impact of a Short Selling Ban?

A short selling ban would restrict traders from profiting from falling stock prices, which could potentially reduce volatility and stabilize the market. However, it could also have negative consequences, such as distorting price discovery, reducing liquidity, and creating moral hazard.

Price discovery is the process of determining the fair value of an asset based on supply and demand. Short selling helps to correct overvalued stocks and provide more accurate information to investors. Without short selling, prices might become inflated and detached from reality, leading to bubbles and crashes.

Liquidity is the ease of buying and selling an asset without affecting its price. Short selling increases liquidity by adding more sellers to the market and facilitating transactions. Without short selling, liquidity might dry up and make it harder for investors to trade efficiently and quickly.

Moral hazard is the tendency of people to take more risks when they are protected from the consequences. Short selling acts as a check on corporate governance and performance by holding managers accountable and exposing frauds and scandals. Without short selling, managers might become complacent and irresponsible, knowing that their stocks are shielded from downward pressure.

Conclusion

The US banking crisis has sparked a debate on whether short selling should be banned. While some argue that short selling is harmful and destabilizing, others contend that it is beneficial and efficient. A short-selling ban might have some positive effects, such as reducing panic and restoring confidence, but it might also have some negative effects, such as impairing price discovery, liquidity, and moral hazard. Ultimately, the decision rests with the regulators, who have to weigh the costs and benefits of such a measure.
“`
“`